technology
management How
Much Does That Technology Cost Your
Business? articles
index Articles email:
info@meyergrp.com
![]()
By Peter Meyer for the Business &
Economic Review
The good news is that the new technologies
are in the hands of those who can use them
most immediately: Your line employees. The
bad news is the investment. It is probably
larger than you think or ever dreamed
possible. How do you get back to that good
news? Can you control the cost of
technology you do not understand? This
article is about how to give the right
direction to your people so they do that
for you.
What is going on in your company while you
are reading this? Someone is buying
Pentium class machines. Someone is looking
at Internet appliances (they really
are called Internet toasters!)
Someone is at an Intranet seminar,
learning how to build you one to go with
your Internet. Someone is choosing a
numerical control system. With luck, no
one will try to explain it to you later.
Someone is buying a copier that has more
computer power than your entire school had
when you got your degree. Someone is
losing at a computer game that might have
overloaded the big computer you bought
fifteen years ago.
What is costing you is the time
your people spend on selecting technology.
The hardware is cheap. Software is almost,
but not quite cheap. Support is getting
expensive. Your people's time and focus
are what could be your competitive
advantage next year. If your line teams
buy only half the things they are looking
at, you will spend more in opportunity
costs than you want to calculate. That is
what has changed. The
change happened because only a few years
ago you had an Information Technology (IT)
department that had people in white coats
who spoke their own language. You could
rely on them to design technology
investments so that they made sense for
your business. They delivered the tools to
your people when and where needed, or so
you hoped. Using the IT department has a
big advantage. It puts the process in the
hands of people trained to understand what
a SLIP protocol is and who have the time
to investigate why a copier might need
one.
That meant that your sales managers sold.
Your operations managers made things
happen and your finance people made sure
you were in control.
Now, every department can have their own
informal IT function to manage the LANs,
support the database application, and make
sure that the clients and servers keep
their roles straight. Your expense is not
in hardware and software. Your risk is in
the opportunity cost of your best people
doing IT work.
Time is your most critical resource, the
one you can never renew. When your best
people spend it in the wrong place, your
business slows. Your best front line
resources are focussing on which Netscape
plug in to buy. Suddenly, your company is
getting slower. Not because you are
getting more bureaucratic, but because you
are getting less so. When this happens,
you lose a chance to compete.
How do you balance these? You want to
leave responsibility and authority at the
front line. You need to keep the business
moving faster and faster. The answer is
not centralization, nor is returning to
refrigerator sized computers that require
water to cool them. It is not to ask each
manager to bring their technology decision
to you. Instead, it is time to ask the
line to buy effect instead of
technology.
What Are You Buying, and For
Whom?
Consider your best salespeople as a model.
You probably ask your sales teams to sell
the sizzle, not the steak. The best sell
what the user gets and does. That becomes
the compelling reason to buy your features
and benefits. A great salesperson focuses
on effect before process or tools. This is
more customer centered, and it works.
Ask your people to treat investments the
same way. Ask them to buy the way you are
asking the sales team to sell. They should
buy what the device does, not
how it does it. They should only
buy to get what they need done, not for
things they might need later.
Ask your line people looking at the new
technologies to define the consumer of
that technology. It's the first
question to look at, before the processor
or the price. Whether this is a copier or
an Intranet, is it Herm down the hall who
is the person who will benefit? If so,
forget the folks on the other floor, focus
on Herm and his peers.
Step two: Ask your people to define the
effect as their customer sees it. What
does Herm need? Will this technology
provide it?
Asking about the technology itself is not
your role. You have people for that. Your
role is to make sure that someone is
asking about the effect, and whether it
meets the needs.
An effective role for you is to tell your
people that you will let them study and
buy anything that they think makes
sense. All you ask in return is that when
you wander down to Herm, he can show that
he is more effective than he used to be.
That he can say it was worth his time. If
he is and can, then you are happy. Tell
your advocates that if he is not
substantially more effective, no matter
how modern the product or technology is,
no matter how good the deal, you have an
opportunity open in the sub branch in
Bangor, Maine.
What You Don't Want to Buy
There are some effects you do not want
your people to buy. For instance, using
technology to maintain parity with your
key competitors. They may be tempting, but
competitive parity is not a good enough
reason to invest your people's time in new
technologies.
For instance, did you wage a Web page war?
Did you and your competitor each spend
between one and five million dollars on
excellent WWW sites, only to discover that
your customers could not care less? Do you
get plenty of hits (visits to your site)
but few sales? Did you save the time of
your people, or are they still handling
the same load of calls and letters that
they used to?
Consider that most of these tools are not
just unproven. They are so new that no one
really knows what they will do for you. If
your own people cannot tell you that, can
the other guy figure it out? Your
competition may be good, but is it more
than the blind leading the blind?
The other effect that you do not need to
spend time on is the Field of Dreams. Some
products have succeeded with a philosophy
of "If we build it, they will come." Many
more have languished until someone found a
way to make them attractive.
Did you ever hear of LOMAC? The Logical
Machine Corporation started in California
making a highly rated voice driven desktop
computer. Not much later the Osborne
Computer Company made portable computers
that got great reviews. Ask your people if
they would rather be LOMAC or Apple in the
'80s? Osborne or Compaq today? If you
build it, even if the pundits love it,
your customers will not use it for more
than a few months unless they get an
effect they need.
Lastly, that free excess capacity may cost
you more than you ever thought possible.
In the old days, when the new tool came
with excess capacity that no one knew how
to use, your IT department would figure
out what to do with it. Now, who will be
the person who studies it? Will they be
your line staff, taking time away from
your core work? Can you afford that?
When buying excess technology, someone is
trading present time for future value. It
is usually an unconscious decision. Yet,
how often do you allow your finance people
to trade present value for future value
without thinking it through? Here the cost
is time away from key tasks. It your line
teams are studying some future capacity
they got 'free,' what is the real cost to
you? Don't let your best people
unconsciously spend your most critical
resource. Direct them to avoid buying
futures that do not have a clear benefit
to Herm or his equivalent.
Give the Right Direction
Do the Internet appliances sound
suspiciously like the unintelligent
terminals that IBM used to sell you and
your people told you to get rid of? Don't
worry about that. Worry about what your
line people are doing with their time. If
they are improving the effect of what you
deliver, forget the technology.
Keep the decision making at the local
level, and encourage more of it. Task the
teams with deciding how they are going to
enter and dominate a new market. Then they
choose the technology they need to make it
happen. All you can do is ask them what
they are doing with their time to get you
competitive advantage instead of creeping
elegance.
This piece appeared in similar form in the
January 1997 issue of B&ER. It is
copyright 1996 by the Meyer Group, all
rights reserved.
![]()
top
of
article
![]()
index of articles
Articles
Business
Growth
Executive
Management
Marketing
Consultant
Support
Technology
Management
The Meyer Group
883 Cadillac Drive
Scotts Valley, CA 95066-3303
(831) 439-9607
![]()
Business
Growth
Executive
Management
Marketing
Consultant
Support
Technology
Management
phone: (831) 439-9607
home
| corporate
page
| hot
topics and links
| articles
| books
| have
a question
print
and broadcast media
page
| about
us
| meet
the team
| search
| the
meyer index
© 2000 The Meyer Group | All rights
reserved